Digital Discovery Assessment

The assessment that asks the right questions

95 out of 100 companies invest in AI and see none of it in their P&L. Not because the technology does not work, but because nobody analysed beforehand where the real leverage sits.

This page explains what most initiatives fail on, and why a situation analysis has to come from the outside. Scope, flat fee and process are on the assessment page.

95%of the organisations studied saw no business return on their AI investments (MIT)
74%fail to scale measurable value from AI (BCG, 1,000 executives across 59 countries)
70%of the problems arise with people and processes, only 10 percent with the algorithms (BCG)
21%have fundamentally redesigned workflows, everyone else layers AI onto existing processes (McKinsey)
01 · The finding

The numbers are clear, and so is the cause

BCG surveyed 1,000 executives across 59 countries: three out of four companies fail to create scalable value from their AI investments. Across more than 300 initiatives studied, MIT arrived at a rate of 95 percent with no measurable effect on the P&L. Gartner expects that through 2026 around 60 percent of all AI projects will be abandoned for lack of a solid data foundation.

Not the models

MIT explicitly locates the cause outside model quality, in the missing anchoring within the organisation. Executives blame regulation or technology, the study shows something else.

People and processes

BCG puts a clean number on it: around 70 percent of the problems sit with people and processes, 20 percent with technology, only 10 percent with the algorithms. Yet those last 10 percent absorb a disproportionate share of the effort.

Data that does not hold

Without AI-ready data an initiative collapses regardless of how good the idea was. In 2025, 42 percent of companies abandoned most of their AI initiatives, up from 17 percent the year before.

And still, almost every initiative opens with the question «which tool do we pick?» It is demonstrably the one question that decides the least about the outcome.
02 · The outside view

Why an assessment has to come from outside

Your employees know best where things get stuck day to day. Those ideas are the starting point of every good assessment, but not its result.

Internal judgements almost always rest on yesterday's picture of what is possible. What an AI system can do today has shifted several times over the past twelve months. Anyone forming an idea based on what they saw a year ago will consistently aim too low. Or aim at a process that is not the expensive one.

Then there is the blind spot. Processes that grew over time are perceived from the inside as given, not as something you can design. That is exactly where the value sits. McKinsey tested 25 organisational attributes against actual bottom-line impact. By far the largest effect came from fundamentally redesigning workflows. Only 21 percent of users have fundamentally redesigned any workflows at all. Everyone else layers AI onto their existing processes.

A workshop puts the scenarios on the table, and that is a necessary phase. What tips the scale is the step after it: assessing the value behind each individual scenario. That requires a methodical process analysis and a view that does not already know the processes.

What an assessment delivers

It takes your ideas seriously
The demand is in the house. It is rarely articulated where the leverage is greatest.
It challenges them consistently
Every assumption is held against the current state of the technology. Some do not survive that.
It goes deep
The actual business case emerges once each scenario is costed out on its own merits.
The MIT study attributes the success of the few winners not to size, budget or the best model, but to the fact that they pick a single pain point and implement it cleanly. Working out the scenarios together is what produces the candidates. Which one is the right one only emerges from assessing their value.
03 · How we work

How we proceed

Four steps that build on each other. The third is the one most people skip.

1Intake

We record the starting position

Processes, data situation and the existing system landscape. And we listen to where management and employees each see the problem. Both views, because they are rarely the same one.

2Challenge

Every idea is held up to reality

Against what is actually possible today. Some assumptions do not survive that, and some ideas turn out considerably larger than expected. That is what we are here for.

3Analysis

We work the candidates through

Effort, data maturity, process depth, realistic benefit. This is where it is decided which use case carries and which one merely sounds good. This step turns a collection of scenarios into a basis for deciding.

4Priorities

You get a ranking, not a wish list

With the one use case you should start with, and the reasoning for why the others wait. Reasoned means: traceable for someone who was not in the room.

04 · The result

What you hold in your hands

Documented process analysis

Your workflows with the points identified where AI genuinely provides leverage.

An honest read on data maturity

Including the items that have to be solved first. Also when that is the less comfortable answer.

Prioritised use cases

With an estimate of effort and benefit, so that you can decide internally.

A roadmap for the first 90 days

Concrete enough to start on the Monday after. The result is yours, even if you do not continue with us.

05 · Your advantage

The mid-market has a head start here

Large corporations run the most pilots and take nine months on average to move one of them into operation. Mid-sized companies do the same in around 90 days. Short paths, clear decisions, manageable structures: what often counted as a disadvantage in digitalisation is a genuine head start with AI.

Provided you start at the right point. That is exactly what the assessment is for.

On the sources

MIT NANDA, «The GenAI Divide», 2025
More than 300 public AI initiatives, 52 interviews, 153 survey responses. The 95 percent figure is contested, because the definition of success is narrow and the interview base small. The criticism targets the precision of the number, not its direction.
BCG, «Where's the Value in AI?», 2024
1,000 executives from 59 countries and more than 20 sectors. Methodologically the broadest of the studies cited here.
McKinsey, «The State of AI», March 2025
Global survey. Of 25 organisational attributes tested, redesigning workflows has the largest effect on bottom-line impact.

Start at the right point

Every assessment begins with a free initial call of around 20 minutes. In it we clarify the task and whether an assessment is the right thing for you at all.

Book an initial call → See scope and flat fee →